Trump’s Ukraine War Dilemma

Trump spent 2024 telling MAGA that supporting Ukraine was a waste of taxpayer dollars, Ukraine is corrupt, and Zelinski was a snake oil salesman.

Now Trump is backpedaling, moving from dove to hawk, now that he is in the presidential office. Trump has a dilemma, does he continue the dove position and throw Ukraine under the bus or does he transition to the hawk position and backstab his MAGA followers?

Trump announces Ukraine may tap into 300B$ of Russian frozen assets to purchase US arms. This was part of my one day peace plan, that Trump could not live up to on his own, that was sent to Trump in October 2024, when he and his MAGA followers were deriding Ukraine and belittling Zhelinski. He apparently got my peace plan and is perfecting its use to resolve the Russo-Ukrainian war. I am glad to be of service.

President Trump has interesting decisions to make, being a Churchill free world hero or Chamberlain’s appeasing stepchild.

Does he give Russian genocide in Ukraine a pass or does he support Ukraine fighting for its freedom as a front line defense barricade to Russian territorial imperialism?

President Trump

Given the 150,000 documented instances of war crimes, genocide and ruthless agression by Russian politicians and military generalcy, the 1,000,000 in causalities and 1T$ in destruction, to date, are you, as leader of the free world, going to insist upon accountability by trials and hangings, Nuremberg II, or simply give Russians a pass for the sake of an immediate unjust peace?

The American people have a right to know if you are truly D. J. Chamberlain or D. J. Churchill.

The problem with Libertarian values solving the war is that Moscow Authorities are not libertarian, but genocidel territorial colonial imperialists, with an embedded cultural orientation that no libertarian platitude is going to change.

Trump is diluted if he thinks Moscow wants peace other than only temporarily after complete subjugation of all of Ukraine.